Customer login 
After months of practical testing, it is clear that Claude AI clearly outperforms ChatGPT in complex development projects. Here are our honest experiences, comparisons and concrete use cases from our daily work at Olbricht IT.
While ChatGPT shines for quick responses, Claude shows its true strengths with extensive projects:
Longer contexts, more consistent results, more precise code analysis – and with significantly fewer “hallucinations”.
Why Claude AI has noticeably improved our day-to-day work
After intensive testing with various AI tools, we at Olbricht IT have come to a clear conclusion: Claude AI is often the better choice than ChatGPT for complex development projects.
Our main areas of application for Claude:
- Extensive code reviews: Analyze entire project structures in one go
- API development: Consistent documentation and implementation
- Complex content structures: websites and apps with consistent logic
- Technical concepts: Detailed planning documents without losing topics
The direct comparison: Claude AI vs ChatGPT
Based on 6+ months of intensive use of both tools in real projects:
| Criterion | 🎯 Claude AI | 💬 ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Context processing | ✅ Up to 200k tokens – entire codebases in one chat | ⚠️ Limited – large projects must be split up |
| Code quality | ✅ Consistent structure, fewer bugs | ⚠️ Good for snippets, inconsistent for larger projects |
| Fidelity to the facts | Significantly fewer “hallucinations” | Invents non-existent APIs/methods more frequently |
| Creativity | ⚠️ Structured, but less spontaneous | ✅ Very creative during brainstorming sessions |
| Specialized knowledge | ⚠️ Sometimes incomplete for niche technologies | ✅ Often more precise with special frameworks |
✅ Claude’s strengths
- Processes complete project documentation
- Maintains focus during long conversations
- Fewer errors with structured tasks
- Better code architecture proposals
❌ Current limitations
- Less dynamic with rapid topic changes
- Partly more conservative with creative solutions
- Not always up-to-date with the latest technologies
- Can still give wrong answers
Our quality assurance
Also applies with Claude AI: Trust is good, control is better.
Our workflow:
- ✅ Every AI output is checked by experienced developers
- ✅ Automated tests for all generated code sections
- ✅ Fact check for technical claims
- ✅ Multiple validation for critical system components
Eric Fischer, IT Architecture Consultant
Dein Ansprechpartner für KI in Osnabrück
Ready for the next level?
We are currently developing AI-supported solutions for web, mobile and automation that will set new standards. The first results are already visible in our latest customer projects.
Interested in working with us? Contact us for a non-binding consultation!
Note: This experience report is based on 6+ months of practical use of both AI tools in real projects. We also tested Microsoft Copilot, but it could not match the flexibility or depth of the other tools.
